May 10, 2026

16 thoughts on “Yankees.com: Fried can’t match the Miz but helps give Yankees’ run-down ‘pen a rest

  1. Pinstripe Alley “ Baseball Prospectus | Smith Brickner & Timothy Jackson: ($) Upon his call-up, a recap of the scouting report that has made Jones the Yankees’ “most polarizing prospect in perhaps a decade.” A steep attack angle has contributed to low contact and high chase rates, a difficult combination to transcend. The question — is his power legit enough to make it work? Timothy and our old friend Smith compare Jones with Munetaka Murakami, who’s hitting .237 but already has 14 homers. Unlike Murakami, though, Jones figures to provide value with his speed and defense, making him a fascinating test case for a singular all-around profile.”

    Murakami strikes out 35% of PAs, and 42% of ABs.

    1. Would he really sacrifice a lot by levelling his swing at least a bit?

  2. Spencer splits 2025 189/314/344 vs LHP 296/373/629 vs RHP
    2026 154/251/308 LHP 281/397/656 RHP

    He might be an impactful hitter even now as a mostly platoon bat.

    1. I’m thinking I don’t know what to say to that. I remember him well, he should be a big deal, but when I think of what to say about him, he seemed… unobjectionable. Competent. Just kind of there.
      RIP, of course. Here’s hoping you guys can do better than my subconscious in this case.

  3. Kyle Harrison has a reverse split so I suppose that’s the reasoning for playing Spencer but then why are Grisham and McMahon, both of whom have been hot lately, sitting?

    P Goldschmidt (R) 1B
    B Rice (L) DH
    A Judge (R) RF
    C Bellinger (L) LF
    A Rosario (R) 3B
    J Chisholm Jr. (L) 2B
    J Caballero (R) SS
    S Jones (L) CF
    A Wells (L)

    1. Not even Goldy, it’s more like “one away from Rice/Judge/Bellinger.”
      That’s protection, and I agree with your idea completely.

    1. If “shoulder issues” = “being unable to pitch in professional baseball after winning the ROY”, then I hae to agree 🙁
      UPD: I was going to fix the “hae,” but then I decided the Scottish seems oddly grumblily appropriate.

    1. I, for one, enjoyed that comment.
      (Possibly for one and all.)

Leave a Reply